Faculty of Health Sciences
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://ir-dev.dut.ac.za/handle/10321/11
Browse
12 results
Search Results
Item Chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for postpartum low back pain : a systematic review(2024) Phakathi, Londeka Nokulunga; Thandar, Yasmeen; Venketsamy, YomikaBackground: Prior research has documented empirical support for the effectiveness of chiropractic treatment for postpartum low back pain (PLBP), mostly in pregnancy but very few in postpartum. Nevertheless, the trustworthiness and calibre of the evidence from these studies has not been adequately scrutinised to authenticate their conclusions and determine whether clinical efficacy or effectiveness is present. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the current evidence in the literature about the therapeutic effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation and mobilisation for chronic lower back pain/pelvic girdle pain in postpartum women. Method: This study employed a qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, specifically utilising the Cochrane systematic review strategy. The literature was sourced via an electronic literature search (e.g. Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, ProQuest Health, etc). The key search terms used were ‘low back pain’, ‘pelvic girdle pain’ together with ‘postpartum’, ‘chiropractic’, ‘manipulation’, and ‘mobilisation’. In addition to the key terms listed above, the search strategy for postpartum low back pain encompassed the following terms: ‘post-natal mechanical low back-ache’ or ‘sacroiliac syndrome/dysfunction’ or ‘sacral subluxation’ or ‘sacral pain’ or ‘lumbopelvic’ or ‘lumbar facet syndrome’. For manipulation and mobilisation, the search encompassed ‘sacral adjustment’ or ‘spinal manipulative therapy’ or ‘manual therapy’. A total of 2127 articles were identified, however 8 were suitable for inclusion. Data was extracted from each included study onto a prepared data extraction sheet. There were 4 reviewers that reviewed the 8 (4 RCTs and 4 CRs) articles included. The independent reviewers only reviewed the 4 RCTs. For Critical Appraisal and Quality of Evidence, Rev Man “Risk of Bias” was used tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and for case reports (CRs), the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool (JBICAT) was selected was used. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to rank the evidence on various levels of clinical strength in relation to treatment outcomes. Results: While 3 of the 4 RCTs demonstrated no significant evidence to support a superior effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation and mobilisation in postpartum low back pain, Pritchard (2001) showed statistically significant evidence in supporting the improvement chiropractic manipulation and mobilisation provided in this demographic. The outcomes in all 4 CRs showed large degrees of favourability to the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation and mobilisation. However, the quality of the evidence was low to moderate at most, thus affecting the extent to which generalizability can be made, in to relation to postpartum low back pain. Conclusion: This study highlighted a dearth in literature and the need for conducting research of higher quality within this demographic. There were also discrepancies in the utilisation of the LBP term and its clinical scope. It is highly important that these discrepancies are resolved by establishing a more concrete and deliberate guideline or definition of this phrase. The production of more RCTs with larger sample sizes that include a variety of demographic characteristics (race, socioeconomic status, age, etc.), was recommended.Item A systematic review on the effectiveness of manipulation and mobilisation in the treatment of osteoarthritis(2023-05-31) Khamissa, Ahmed; Korporaal, Charmaine MariaOsteoarthritis (OA) is an increasing condition globally as the population ages and the number of elderly increases. However, there is a lack of relevant evidence-based guidelines for manual therapy in the treatment of OA especially involving OA of the spine, wrist, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and the glenohumeral joint (GHJ). A systematic review organises and critiques literature in a more concise form for practitioners. This study aimed to briefly provide practitioners the evidence available on the effectiveness of manipulation and mobilisation on OA. Methods: A systematic review of available literature was performed using keywords including “manipulation”; “mobilization”; “manual therapy” and “osteoarthritis”; “spondylosis”; “degenerative joint disease”; “degenerative disc disease”. The database searches were through CINAHL, DUT summons, Google scholar, Pubmed and Scopus. Following a screening using inclusion criteria, 20 articles were chosen for review. Each of the studies were than reviewed by three reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, the PEDRO scale, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale for case series and the JBI scale for case reports. These scales evaluated the methodological rigour (internal validity) of the chosen articles. In addition, the external validity was determined through a critique of each article. The internal and external validity formed the basis for decisions on the level of evidence provided in support of manual therapy. Results: Of those chosen articles, 13 provided evidence of treatment programmes and could not contribute to evidence specific to mobilisation and manipulation. In contrast, four articles assessed the efficacy of mobilisation, one study assessed the efficacy of manipulation, and two studies assessed the efficacy of neural mobilisation. There was moderate evidence in support of mobilisation on thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) OA, but only limited evidence in support of its use on cervical spine OA and no evidence in support of its use on lumbar spine OA, GHJ OA and TMJ OA. Manipulation was suggested to have moderate to limited evidence in support of its use on lumbar spine OA, but no evidence for cervical spine OA. Neural mobilisation was suggested to have limited evidence in support of its use for treating thumb CMC OA. Conclusion: It was evident in this systematic review that there is limited evidence for mobilisation, manipulation and neural mobilisation. Further research is required to expand on the limited areas, as well as strengthen the current evidence for clinical use.Item Immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation compared with muscle energy technique on neck muscle activity and range of motion in asymptomatic participants : a randomized study(Elsevier BV, 2022-07) King, Sasha Lee; Docrat, Aadil; Abdul-Rasheed, AshuraObjective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation (SM) compared with muscle energy technique (MET) on neck muscle activity and range of motion in asymptomatic people. Methods: A randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a chiropractic teaching clinic in Durban, South Africa. Fifty asymptomatic participants between 18 and 35 years of age were randomly assigned into group 1 or group 2. Group 1 received cervical SM, and group 2 received MET. Participants were blinded to group allocation only. Baseline and post-test measurements consisted of resting upper trapezius and posterior cervical muscle activity and cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in lateral flexion and extension. Results: A significant difference was found in cervical ROM within groups (P < .001), with no significant difference observed between the 2 groups. The right posterior cervical muscles showed a significant difference in group 1 only (P = .012). No significant muscle activity changes occurred in group 2. Resting muscle activity measures showed no statistically significant changes between groups. Conclusion: A single application of SM and MET to the cervical spine immediately increased cervical ROM. Neither cervical SM nor MET changed resting posterior cervical and upper trapezius muscle activity.Item Motion palpation used as a postmanipulation assessment tool for monitoring end-feel improvement : a randomized controlled trial of test responsiveness(Elsevier BV, 2009-09) Lakhani, Ekta; Nook, Brian; Haas, Mitchell; Docrat, AadilA tenet of motion palpation theory is the ability to confirm postadjustive segmental end-feel improvement (EFI). Only one previous trial has evaluated the responsiveness of EFI; this was a study of the thoracic spine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of postadjustive end-feel for evaluating improvement in putative segmental spinal motion restriction after spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) of the cervical spine.Methods
A prospective, blinded, randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial was conducted with 20 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic participants recruited from a chiropractic teaching clinic. The treatment group received SMT, and the control group received placebo detuned ultrasound. Responsiveness was evaluated as the etiologic fraction (% of cases with EFI attributable to SMT) and as the sensitivity and specificity of change.Results
For the entire sample, the etiologic fraction was 63% (P = .002), sensitivity was 93%, and specificity was 67%. For symptomatic participants, a strong relationship appeared to exist between receiving SMT and EFI (etiologic fraction = 78%, P = .006; sensitivity = 90%; specificity = 80%). A strong relationship was not found for asymptomatic participants (etiologic fraction = 40%, P = .444; sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 40%), where EFI was recorded frequently, whether participants received SMT or detuned ultrasound.Conclusion
The findings of this study showed that motion palpation of end-feel assessment appears to be a responsive postmanipulation assessment tool in the cervical spine for determining whether perceived motion restriction found before treatment improves after SMT. This observation may be limited to symptomatic participants.Item The effect of sacroiliac joint manipulation on gluteus maximus muscle activity in asymptomatic participants(2020-06-10) Worth, Kevin; Kretzmann, HeidiPurpose: The effects of spinal manipulation are well documented; however there is a gap in the current literature regarding the exact mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of spinal manipulation. Further evidence is required to improve the understanding of the neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulative therapy and its effect on muscle activity. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of sacroiliac joint manipulation on gluteus maximus muscle activity in an asymptomatic sample group when compared to a placebo group Methods: A randomized, controlled, pre-test, post-test repeated measures design allowed for 28 participants, aged 18-40 years old, with sacroiliac joint dysfunction to be allocated into either a sacroiliac joint manipulation or a placebo group. Muscle activity of the gluteus maximus was measured before intervention and again 10 minutes post intervention. IBM SPSS was used to analyse the data with significance set at (p=0.05). Repeated measures ANOVA testing was used to determine the significance within and between groups. Results: There was evidence of an improvement in the intervention compared with the placebo group from pre to post for outcomes of Channel A mean and maximum values, and for Channel B maximum values. In the other measures there was a trend observed but insufficient evidence to conclude that it was a real effect. The partial eta squared values were relatively small for these non-significant effects and medium to large for the significant effects. Conclusion: Analysis of the results revealed that there was evidence of an improvement in the intervention group when compared with the placebo group in some of the outcomes measured while other outcomes measured trended towards an improvement but lacked a sufficiently large sample size to conclude that it was a statistically significant effect.Item The effect of talocrural joint manipulation on muscle activity of the lower limb, balance, pain and disability in participants with chronic ankle instability syndrome(2019-09-05) McLaren, Murray James; O’Connor, Laura; Puckree, ThreethambalBackground and Purpose: Ankle sprain injuries are prevalent in both the sporting and general population and can develop into chronic ankle instability syndrome (CAIS). When this occurs, there is a tendency for the ankle to re-sprain following an acute ankle sprain. Deficits in proprioception and neuromuscular control, specifically of the peroneal muscles, may lead to altered balance and postural stability in patients with CAIS. Recent research suggests that the ankle invertors and plantarflexors are also affected. Joint manipulation has been shown to result in reduced pain and improved foot and ankle functioning in individuals with CAIS, however, the exact mechanism(s) through which joint manipulation brings about these effects is not clear and the field of extremity joint manipulation on arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is under-investigated. This study aimed to determine the immediate effect of talocrural joint manipulation on postural stability and the muscle activity of the ankle invertors, evertors and plantarflexors by assessing surface electromyography (sEMG) of these muscles during static single-limb postural stability testing. Subjective outcomes of pain and disability were also measured through the use of the foot and ankle disability index (FADI). Methods: This study used a randomized, single blinded placebo controlled pre-test, and a repeated post-test measures experimental design. A sample of 42 participants, with grade I or II CAIS, aged 18-45 years, were randomly allocated into two groups. One group received a long axis distraction talocrural joint manipulation and the other group, a sham manipulation. General pain and disability (FADI), postural stability (Biosway Portable Balance System) and muscle activity (Biopac wireless EMG system) measurements were taken before the intervention. Muscle activity and postural stability were assessed again immediately after the intervention and then again 20 minutes later. Postural stability and muscle activity were measured both with participants’ eyes opened and eyes closed. FADI measurements were taken 24 hours after the intervention. Results: The two groups were comparable at baseline for age, gender, body mass index, pain and disability, postural stability and muscle activity (p > 0.050). An inter-group analysis showed a significant improvement in FADI (p= 0.005) and general pain scores (p= 0.039) when compared to the placebo group post-manipulation. There were no significant changes in the manipulation group for muscle activity and postural stability when compared to the placebo group (p > 0.050). Intra-group analysis showed an overall improvement over time for eyes opened postural stability in the manipulation group (p= 0.040) and decreased fibularis longus muscle activity in the placebo group with eyes open balance testing (p= 0.047) and eyes closed balance testing (p= 0.023). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that talocrural joint manipulation had a positive effect on pain and disability in individuals with CAIS. No significant differences were found between the intervention and placebo groups for limb muscle activity and postural stability. Intra-group analysis showed that the manipulation had a positive effect on eyes-open postural stability performance and that there may have been a trend of an effect of manipulation counteracting muscle fatigue experienced in the fibularis longus of the placebo group. Further investigation to further elucidate the effect of manipulation in CAIS is recommended.Item The effect of low back manipulation compared to combined low back and hip manipulation for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain(2018) Roberts, Jesse Bruins; Haswell, Garrick DavidBackground: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a common ailment treated by chiropractors. Most chiropractors focus on the localised lumbar area of pain. Other chiropractors focus on restoring function to compensating articulations in the ‗full kinematic chain‘ by assessing and treating the lower extremity in conjunction to the low back. Patients with LBP often exhibit decreased hip-related ranges of motion that may result in future LBP, relapse and a prolonged recovery time. Studies investigating the effect of treating the kinematic chain in relation to LBP are limited and the literature, although widely taught and practiced, is largely anecdotal. Chiropractic manipulation has shown to be effective in the treatment of LBP and many lower extremity conditions. Objectives: This study set out to determine if a combination of low back and hip manipulation would result in a more beneficial outcome for the participant, suffering with CNSLBP, than low back manipulation alone in terms of objective and subjective outcomes. Method: The study was a randomised controlled clinical trial which, through purposive sampling, consisted of 50 participants with CNSLBP and hip joint dysfunction. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each [A and B]. Group A received low back manipulation alone and Group B received combined low back and hip manipulation. Subjective data was obtained through the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Objective data was obtained through the use of a Force Dial Algometer and an Inclinometer. Data collection occurred at the first, third and fifth consultations and was coded and analysed using IBM SPSS version 24.0. A p-value value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically relevant. Results: Intra-group testing showed that there was a significant difference over time, within both groups, with regards to internal rotation and external rotation of the hip, flexion of the lumbar spine, increased pain tolerance in Algometer tests, decreased NPRS values and decreased ODI scores. Within Group A, the mean scores for hip flexion reflected a more significant increase over time than those of Group B. Within Group B, the mean scores for left and right rotation of the lumbar spine reflected a more significant change over time than those of Group A. Inter-group testing showed no significantly differential treatment effect for any of the subjective and objective outcomes. This means that both treatments were equally effective and the hypothesis, that suggested that Group B would improve more than Group A, was incorrect. Conclusion: Both treatment groups improved subjectively and objectively with regards to CNSLBP. Inter-group testing showed that statistically, and for all outcome measurements, there were no significant differences between the two treatment group‘s results. This suggested that there was no additional benefit in combining hip joint manipulation with low back manipulation in the treatment of CNSLBP.Item The effect of ankle joint manipulation on peroneal and soleus muscle activity in chronic ankle instability syndrome(2016) Dicks, Jason; O'Connor, Laura; Puckree, ThreethambalPurpose: Ankle sprains are amongst the most common injury sustained by athletes and the general public. When an ankle is repeatedly sprained it results in chronic ankle instability syndrome (CAIS). This repeated trauma results in disruption of the afferent nerve supply from the injured joint, which affects the motor neuron pool excitability of the peroneal and soleus muscles resulting in arthogenic muscle inhibition (AMI). Traditional treatment for CAIS focuses on rehabilitation of the affected muscles via strength and proprioceptive training. Recent literature has shown that the addition of ankle joint manipulation resulted in improved clinical outcomes in the treatment of CAIS. The mechanism on how joint manipulation affects AMI is under-investigated especially in extremity joints. Thus this study aimed to determine the immediate effect of ankle joint manipulation on peroneal and soleus muscle activity, by assessing surface electromyography (sEMG) H/M ratio to detect a change in the proportion of the total motor neuron pool being recruited, in participants with CAIS. Methods: The study utilised a quantitative, experimental, pre-test post-test study design. Forty two participants with grade I and II CAIS, aged 18-45 years, were randomly allocated into one of three groups. Group one received a single talocrural joint long axis distraction manipulation, group two received a sham manipulation and group three was the control receiving no intervention. sEMG H/M ratio measurements were taken before and immediately after the intervention using a Biopac wireless emg system. Results: The groups were comparable at baseline for age, gender, body mass index and H/M ratio measurements for the soleus and peroneal muscles (p < 0.050). Intra-group analysis of the soleus muscle H/M ratio showed no statistically significant change over time for the manipulation (p = 0.975) and sham (p = 0.056) groups, with the control group showing a statistically significant (p = 0.019) decrease in the H/M ratio. For the peroneal muscle no statistically significant (p > 0.050) differences were observed in any of the three groups. Inter-group analysis of the soleus muscle H/M ratio measurements showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.470; F = 1.010) over time, with Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test revealing a statistically significant (p = 0.028) difference being observed between the sham and control groups in terms of post soleus muscle H/M ratio measurements. Conclusion: This study failed to show that ankle joint manipulation affects the soleus and peroneal muscles in terms of H/M ratio measurements in participants with CAIS. There may have been a trend of an effect of the sham and manipulation interventions counteracting the muscle fatigue experienced in the control group, however further investigation is required.Item The effect of four different manipulative techniques on Iliotibial Band Friction Syndrome (ITBFS) in terms of primary and secondary outcome measures(2016) Botes, Jacques Andre; Gomes, Adrian Neil; Korporaal, Charmaine MariaBackground: Iliotibial band friction syndrome is a common dysfunction seen in athletes. Athletes develop biomechanical changes yet still continue with their sport. However, this syndrome limits their ability to participate at peak performance. This study determined which participants benefitted in terms of biomechanical and clinical outcomes in one of four groups: ankle joint, superior tibio-fibular joint, sacroiliac joint or a combination manipulation group (which contained any two of the three joint restrictions). Methods: This Durban University of Technology Institutional Research and Ethics Committee approved prospective clinical trial, utilised stratified sampling, with 48 participants across four groups: ankle (14); superior tibio-fibular (11), sacroiliac (12) and combination (11). The participants underwent six treatments in three weeks. Data collection occurred before consultations one, three, five and seven. The data included primary measures of the knee score questionnaire (KSQ), the algometer, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the secondary measures of the Feiss line, the heel leg alignment, bilateral leg length, Q angle and tibio-femoral angle. All data was computed utilising the ANOVA testing, with a p-value <0.05 being significant and a 95% confidence interval. Pearson’s correlations were completed for intragroup associations between primary and secondary outcome measures. Results: The intragroup analysis revealed that all groups had significant changes in the KSQ and VAS, with the exception of the sacroiliac joint manipulation group (KSQ outcome not significant). Intergroup analysis revealed no differences between the groups with the exception of the combination group, which showed a significant increase in the tibio-femoral angle. Most commonly, the Pearson’s correlation revealed that changes in leg length were related to differences in primary outcome measures, irrespective of the group being tested. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study indicated that manipulation of the distal kinematic chain improved alignment and clinical outcomes to a greater degree than manipulating proximal restrictions. It is suggested with caution (due to limited sample size) that patients should first have their distal kinematic chain manipulated before more proximal joints are manipulated to achieve better outcomes.Item A systematic review of the non-invasive therapeutic modalities in the treatment of myofascial pain and dysfunction(2015-03-09) Roopchand, Adelle Kemlall; Korporaal, Charmaine Maria; Harpham, Graeme JohnBackground: Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction (MPD) is a diagnosis commonly encountered by practitioners, hence, there are several treatment approaches employed by various practicing physicians. Practitioners are required to perform evidence-based protocols on patients; however, such intervention becomes increasingly difficult with the increasing volume of evidence available with regards to treatment of MPD. A systematic review provides a well-structured, critical analysis of the available protocols, and as such, provides practitioners with an evidence-based summary of the available modalities and the effectiveness of these modalities. Thus, the aim of the study was to systematically review and evaluate the literature to determine the effects of various non-invasive modalities on MPD. Objectives: Studies investigating various non-invasive modalities were identified, evaluated against the inclusion criteria and then reviewed against PEDro criteria to present current available evidence regarding their effectiveness as a source of treatment for MPD. Methods: A literature search was conducted, based on key terms including: active and latent myofascial trigger points, manual therapy, manipulation, acupressure, massage, muscle stretching, ultrasound, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, electric stimulation therapy, magnetic field therapy, and exercise therapy. Databases searched were: PubMed, EBSCOhost, Medline, CINAL, Proquest, Health Source, Sport Discus, Science Direct, Springer Link, Google Scholar and Summons. The articles were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, after which a secondary hand and reference searches were performed. Thereafter, the articles were reviewed by four independent reviewers and the researcher. The PEDro Scale was used to determine methodological rigor of the included studies. The results were then analysed and ranked. Results: Following the screening process during data collection for this study, a total of 25 studies were identified and included. The review and ranking of these studies revealed a moderate level of evidence present for the effectiveness of Topical Agents. A limited level of evidence was noted for TENS, Ischemic Compression, Ultrasound, Laser and Other Modalities. Approximately 25% of the reviewed studies involved combination therapies; hence their outcomes cannot be applied to the effectiveness of individual modalities. Conclusion: Upon comparison of the quality of evidence available for the various types of modalities present for the treatment of MPD, it was noted that Topical Agents were supported by a stronger level of evidence than TENS, Ischeamic Compression, Ultrasound, Laser and Other Modalities. However, due to a lack of strong overall evidence for any of these modalities it has been concluded that more research is required to establish which modality is in fact the most effective.