Predictors of insistent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention
Date
2022-05-13
Authors
Amod, Ameena
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Introduction
Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality
worldwide. The first percutaneous coronary intervention was performed by Andreas
Gruntzig on September 16, 1977. This procedure was performed on patients with
arterial stenosis. The limitations of angioplasty, however, included an unpredictable
acute result- due to early abrupt vessel closure- and relatively high rate of restenosis
at the site of the treated lesion- due mainly to plaque prolapse, vessel recoil, and
constrictive remodelling. A vessel without a stent can have restenosis due to vessel
remodelling as well as elastic recoil. Drug eluting stents have helped in the reduction
of in-stent restenosis, but this still poses a problem for interventional Cardiologist. Instent restenosis is an independent predictor for mortality during follow up, together
with other relevant clinical factors as age, sex, diabetes mellitus, smoke habit,
previous bypass surgery, and left ventricular ejection fraction.
Restenosis is not random; certain patients seem to present with this complication,
having a better understanding of this phenomenon would be useful to save on
financial cost of interventional cardiology as a result of adjuvant medication and
devices. To establish the exact incidence of restenosis is not easy, it depends on a
number of different factors and variables. These include patient related factors,
lesion related and procedure related.
Drug eluting stents tend to drastically reduce the occurrence of severe neo-intimal
proliferation, which is the dominant cause on in-stent restenosis. Optical coherence
tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have played an important
role in assisting with real time imaging of in-stent restenosis. Nevertheless, drug
eluting balloons have been considered as the treatment of choice for in-stent
restenosis.
The study aims to determine the predictors of in-stent stenosis in patients
undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and to recommend measures to
reduce the incidence of in-stent stenosis. This was a quantitative research study. It used the observational and descriptive
retrospective approach focusing on patients who had in-stent restenosis after having
percutaneous coronary intervention from June 2018 – February 2020. The study
was conducted at a single practice called Dr Gafoor and Dr Soosiwala Inc. situated
at the Ethekwini Heart centre, KwaZulu - Natal, Durban, South Africa. Permission to
conduct the study was obtained from the hospital manager as well as the practice
manager of Dr Gafoor and Dr Soosiwala Inc.
The data was collected through patient’s files focusing on patients within the age
group of 18 – 85 years.
Statistical analysis
The data was analysed using the SPSS Statistics 26.0 (Release August 2018) and
Statgraphics centurion 15.1 (2006). The means standard deviation was analysed
whereby a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant
Results
The collected data proved that the use of drug eluting stents improved the come
backs of patients with in-stent restenosis, but this has not eradicated the problem.
There has been a worldwide use of drug eluting stents being used in daily practice.
Although management of drug eluting stent remains unclear, repeat percutaneous
intervention remains the most frequently used treatment. Furthermore, baseline
characteristics showed diabetic, hypertension and dyslipidemic patients had a higher
risk of in-stent stenosis as compared to the other risk factors. (Diabetics 72%;
hypertension 80% and dyslipidemia 78%). 4 out of 57 had acute and late stent
thrombosis. 55% showed it was the left anterior descending artery that was affected
most.
Restenosis can be regarded as a complex disease, whereby, the pathophysiological
mechanisms are not fully understood. The study showed restenosis was higher in
diabetics, hypertension, dyslipidemia and the type of artery affected. However, not
much difference was found in other patient risk factors such as age and smoking This study correlated with other research findings found in the literature.
Nonetheless, longer-term work is required and further imaging of vessels should be
used as well as studies to prove if this will help with eliminating further in-stent
restenosis.
Description
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Health Sciences at Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2022.
Keywords
Restenosis, Patients, Percutaneous intervention
Citation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4450