Meta analysis of heuristic approaches for optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks
dc.contributor.author | Aroba, Oluwasegun Julius | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Naicker, Nalindren | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Adeliyi, Timothy T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ogunsakin, Ropo E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-21T06:28:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-21T06:28:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-30T10:00:44Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: In the literature node localization and energy efficiency are intrinsic problems often experienced in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Consequently, various heuristic approaches have been proposed to allay the challenges faced by WSNs. However, there is little to nothing in the literature to support which of the heuristic approaches is best in optimizing node localization and energy efficiency problems in WSN. The aim of this paper is to assess the best heuristic approach to date on resolving the node localization and energy efficiency in WSNs. Method: The extraction of the relevant articles was designed following the technique of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). All the included research articles were searched from the widely used databases of Google Scholar and Web of Science. All statistical analysis was performed with the fixed-effects model and the random-effects model implementation in RStudio. The overall pooled global estimate and categorization of performance for the heuristic approaches were presented in forest plots. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis and the overall pooled estimated categorization of the heuristic approaches was 35% (95% CI (13%, 67%)). According to subgroup analysis the pooled estimation of heuristic approach with hyper-heuristic was 71% (95% CI: 6% to 99%), I2 = 100%) while the hybrid heuristic, was 31% (95% CI: 3% to 87%, I2 = 100%) and metaheuristic was 21%(95% CI: 9% to 41%, I2 = 100%). Conclusion: It can be concluded based on the experimental results that hyper-heuristic approach outclassed the hybrid heuristic and metaheuristic approaches in optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in WSNs.</jats:p> | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 8 p | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Aroba, O.J. et al. 2020. Meta analysis of heuristic approaches for optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 10(1): 81-88. doi:10.35940/ijeat.a1717.1010120 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.35940/ijeat.a1717.1010120 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2249-8958 (Online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4899 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESP | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology; Vol. 10, Issue 1 | en_US |
dc.subject | Hyper-Heuristic | en_US |
dc.subject | Hybrid Heuristic | en_US |
dc.subject | Metaheuristic | en_US |
dc.subject | Node localization | en_US |
dc.subject | Wireless sensor network | en_US |
dc.title | Meta analysis of heuristic approaches for optimizing node localization and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
local.sdg | SDG14 |