A comparative study of supercritical fluid extraction and accelerated solvent extraction of lipophilic compounds from lignocellulosic biomass
Date
2022-09
Authors
Khanyile Andile
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Lipophilic compounds are non-structural, heterogeneous compounds rich in terpenes,
sterols, fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and glycerides. They have found widespread uses
in different industries, such as the pharmaceutical, medical, cosmetic and
nutraceutical sectors. They are typically extracted from wood using traditional
techniques such as solvent extraction hydro- and steam- distillation. However, these
techniques have several drawbacks such as long extraction times, high energy
consumption, extensive solvent use and degradation of thermosensitive compounds,
which are highly volatile. In this study, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and
accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) were evaluated to extract lipophilic compounds
from lignocellulosic biomass such as pinewood sawdust and Cannabis Sativa L. Their
advantages of using low amounts of solvent, short extraction times and high selectivity
allow them to be used as an alternative extraction technique to traditional methods.
Moreover, SFE uses carbon dioxide, which is safe, cheap and readily available, and it
does not alter the structure of the compounds. In contrast, ASE uses elevated
temperatures and high pressures to prevent the evaporation of highly volatile
compounds.
In order to solve challenges from both an economic and an environmental perspective,
the interaction of process conditions on lipophilic compounds extraction efficiency was
modelled and optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and BoxBehnken design (BBD). The extraction variables optimized for pinewood sawdust
compounds were, SFE: co-solvent (ethanol) flow rate (1-2 ml/min), carbon dioxide
(CO2) flow rate (1-3 ml/min), Temperature (40-60 °C) and pressure (200-300 bar), and
for ASE: static time (10-15 mins), static cycle (1-3) and temperature (80-160 °C).
The process parameters were optimized, and the experimental data was modelled
using RSM for statistical analysis of the BBD extraction process. The experimental
data's quadratic polynomial models gave a coefficient of determination (R2
) of 0.87
and 0.80 for ASE and SFE, respectively. The optimum conditions of ASE were
temperature (160 °C), static time (12.5 mins), and static cycle (1), which resulted in a
maximum yield of 4.2%. The optimum SFE conditions were temperature (50 °C),
pressure (300 bar), CO2 flow rate (3.2 ml/min), and a 2 ml/min co-solvent (ethanol) flow rate that yielded 2.5% lipophilic compounds. The extraction efficiency of pinewood
sawdust lipophilic compounds with ASE was higher compared to the SFE. Although
ASE uses high temperatures that may degrade thermolabile compounds, the short
extraction times may work in their favor since the extracts are not exposed to high
temperatures for long periods. SFE uses low temperatures and long extraction times
compared to ASE. Several properties affect the extraction efficiency, such as volatility,
dissolving power, solubility, and fluid density of the extracting solvent. The extraction
efficiency of lipophilic compounds by SFE may be affected by the supercritical fluid's
solubility and differences in densities at different pressures. In ASE, the high yields
were influenced by the high polarity of the solvent mixture and temperature with a short
extraction time.
The extraction variables optimized using RSM for Cannabis Sativa L. for SFE were
pressure (200-300 bar), co-solvent (ethanol) flow rate (1-2 ml/min) and CO2 flow rate
(1-2 ml/min). The R2 was determined to be 0.9108. The optimum conditions were 300
bar pressure, 1 ml/min co-solvent (ethanol) flowrate, and 2 ml/min CO2 flowrate, which
gave a maximum yield of 88%. The high efficiency observed was brought by the
increase in the flow rate of CO2 at high pressures, which reduces the mass transfer
resistance, while the cosolvent enhanced the solvating power of CO2.
The ASE had a high extraction efficiency for the pinewood sawdust lipophilic
compounds. However, the method's selectivity was very low according to the results
obtained by pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). The
thermosensitive compounds, such as terpenes, decreased from 2.01% to 1.69% upon
the addition of Tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH). The initial concentration of
terpenes was 7.21% in pinewood sawdust by SFE. Upon the addition of TMAH, the
concentration of terpenes of the pinewood sawdust decreased to undetectable levels.
The initial concentration of the terpenes of Cannabis Sativa L. was 14.29% and
decreased in the presence of TMAH to 0.39%. The Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (FTIR) confirmed the presence of lipophilic compounds functional
groups and a fingerprint region of lipophilic compounds of pinewood sawdust and
Cannabis Sativa L. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) showed high thermal stability (250 – 400 ℃). This research
demonstrated the ability of SFE to extract lipophilic compounds from pinewood
sawdust Cannabis Sativa L.
Description
Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Masters in Applied Sciences: Chemistry, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2022.
Keywords
Lipophilic compounds, Supercritical fluid extraction, Accelerated solvent extraction
Citation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4703