Repository logo
 

Steps that count : pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current guidelines- how do they relate?

dc.contributor.authorPillay, Julian Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorKolbe-Alexander, Tracy L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorProper, Karin I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTomaz, Simone A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Mechelen, Willemen_US
dc.contributor.authorLambert, Estelle V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T06:10:55Z
dc.date.available2018-05-29T06:10:55Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBackground. The association between self-perceived and actual physical activity, with particular reference to physical activity guidelines, may be an important factor in determining the extent of uptake of and compliance with physical activity. Objectives. To examine the association between self-perceived and actual physical activity in relation to physical activity guidelines, with reference to volume, intensity and duration of steps/day, and to establish the level of agreement between pedometer-measured and selfreported ambulatory physical activity, in relation to current guidelines. Methods. A convenience sample of adults (N=312; mean (standard deviation) age 37 (9) years), wore a pedometer (minimum 3 consecutive days) and completed a questionnaire that included information on physical activity patterns. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for age and gender, compared volume- and intensity-based steps according to meeting/not meeting guidelines (self-reported). The extent of agreement between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity was also determined. Results. Average (SD) steps/day were 6 574 (3 541). Of a total of 312 participants’ self-reported data, those meeting guidelines (n=63) accumulated significantly more steps/day than those not meeting guidelines (8 753 (4 251) v. 6 022 (3 114) total steps/day and 1 772 (2 020) v. 421 (1 140) aerobic steps/day, respectively; p<0.0001). More than half of the group who self-reported meeting the guidelines did not meet guidelines as per pedometer data. Conclusion. The use of pedometers as an alternative and/or adjunct to self-reported measures is an area for consideration. Steps/day recommendations that consider intensity-based steps may provide significant effects in improving fitness and health.en_US
dc.dut-rims.pubnumDUT-005835en_US
dc.format.extent6 pen_US
dc.identifier.citationPillay, J.D. et al. 2015. Steps that count: Pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current guidelines- how do they relate? South African Journal of Sports Medicine. 26(3): 77-81.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7196/sajsm.534
dc.identifier.issn1015-5163 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2078-516X (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2994
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Sports Medicine Associationen_US
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/268210083_Steps_that_count_Pedometer-measured_physical_activity_self-reported_physical_activity_and_current_guidelines-_how_do_they_relateen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSouth African journal of sports medicine (Online)en_US
dc.titleSteps that count : pedometer-measured physical activity, self-reported physical activity and current guidelines- how do they relate?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PIllay_et_al_SAJSM_Vol26#3_Pg77-81_2014.pdf
Size:
656.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: