Systematic review of the sensitivity, specificity and validity of the active straight leg raise test in low back pain
Date
2024
Authors
Lee, Andrew Christopher
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background
The active straight leg raise test (ASLR) is a commonly used clinical diagnostic test
in a heterogenous group of conditions classified as low back pain. It may be used in
a battery of tests to obtain a clinical diagnosis or to aid in the assessment of motor
control in the lumbopelvic hip complex in the sagittal plane. A few variations of the
ASLR exist in the literature. There is therefore a need to analyse the literature to
determine to the most appropriate clinical application and interpretation of the test
as the incorrect and/or ineffective application of the ASLR may influence patient
outcomes.
Data sources
A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews, Cumulative
Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Scopus.
Study selection
All electronic or paper, English articles, which possessed the required key indexing
terms and represented randomised and non-randomised controlled study designs
were included.
Data extraction and synthesis
The blind review of the 25 articles was conducted by three independent reviewers
(nine reviewers in total) using the non-randomised controlled trials (NOS) and Liddle
scales. This allowed the methodological rigour of the article to be ranked. This
ranking was compared to a critical appraisal of the article in order to achieve an
overall decision with regards to the contribution of the article to the level of evidence
for ASLR test.
Results
The evaluations and combined evidence were then determined for the ASLR under
the heading non-pregnancy related PGP, LBP, and LPP, and various lift heights <10cm, 10-30cm, 30-60cm, full available range of motion, and unspecified range of
motion. Due to study design (observational), no study exceeded level 3 evidence.
Conclusion
The ASLR was found to have a valid face construct, but assertions made in relation
to its constructed validity in non-pregnancy related LBP is limited and conflicting. It
is unclear if a positive ASLR result is from failure form closure of the public
symphysis or the SIJ and if motor control is a contributing factor or product of pain.
Description
Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s degree in Technology, Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban University of Technology, 2024.
Keywords
ASLR pelvic girdle pain, ASLR low back pain, ASLR sacroiliac dysfunction”, ASLR sacroiliitis, ASLR pubic symphysitis, ASLR motor dysfunction”, Lumbar spine dysfunction, ASLR ultrasound, ASLR sensitivity, ASLR specificity, ASLR validity, ASLR lumbar spine instability
Citation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/5617