The epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries in ringball players in KwaZulu-Natal
Date
2020-06-10
Authors
Wiggill, Johan Adriaan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background: Ringball is closely examined and compared to basketball and netball
due to the fact that ringball is derived from those two sports (Gubby and Wellard,
2015), although the biomechanics differ from one another. This may expose players
to different factors that can cause various injuries. Identifying the risk factors such as
age, weight, height, warming up or not warming up before practice or competitive
games etc. (Sinclair et al., 2014: 31-36; Murphy et al., 2003: 15; Russell, 2015), may
help us understand, identify, prevent and manage injuries sustained during play. There
are similarities of the injuries sustained between basketball and netball, however, the
most common and least common injuries may be different.
Aim and Objectives: The aim of this study was to profile musculoskeletal injuries of
ringball players in KwaZulu-Natal. The objectives of this study were: to determine the
period prevalence of musculoskeletal injuries in ringball players; to profile different
types of musculoskeletal injuries in terms of location and severity; to determine the
mechanisms and selected risk factors (e.g. age, height, protective gear, warming up
etc.) of the injuries; and to determine the manner in which participants manage their
musculoskeletal injuries sustained.
Method: The research design was a quantitative paradigm, cross-sectional
descriptive survey, using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was
administered to 110 male and female ringball players in KwaZulu-Natal. Data from the
questionnaire was statistically analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences (SPSS) package (version 25) with a p-value of 0.05 indicating
statistical significance. The data was described using frequencies and percentages for
categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables. In
order to assess associations between risk factors and injury, a Pearson’s chi square
test was performed for categorical risk factors, and t-tests were performed for
continuous variables. Results: A target population of 110 was calculated from a total of 152 players. The
target population included male and female ringball players who were 16 years and
older. Of the 110 questionnaires administered, 76 ringball players completed the
research questionnaire. This resulted in a response rate of 69.1%. The prevalence of
at least one injury, after at least one season played, in ringball players was 80.3% (n=
61). The most commonly reported location of injuries was foot/ankle injury at 35.5%
(n= 33), followed by knee injury at 29% (n= 27) and wrist injury at 8.6% (n= 8). The
most common mechanism of injury that was reported was landing 15.3% (n= 9),
jumping 8.5% (n= 5), goal shooting 6.8% (n= 4), defending 6.8% (n= 4), collision 6.8%
(n= 4), and other mechanisms 6.8% (n= 4). The participants reported that the most
common healthcare professional utilised in general was self-treatment followed by no
treatment. Only after the participants’ first injury, was there an indication of use of
healthcare professionals such as physiotherapists, chiropractors and general
practitioners. Furthermore, significant association between injury and not warming up
before training (p-value of 0.013) and competitive matches (p-value of 0.044) was
found.
Discussion: This study revealed that ringball shares many similarities to basketball
and netball (for example: the most common location of injury was the foot/ankle and
knee). Mckay et al., (1996), reported minor differences between their study. and this
one.Mckay et al., (1996) reported that the hand was the second most commonly
injured area, whereas this study reported that the knee was the second most
commonly injured area. This study reported that the foot/ankle, knee and wrist were
most commonly injured. The results showed that there was a lack of primary
healthcare professionals at competitive matches and training sessions. Primary
healthcare professionals are needed at the relevant matches and training sessions so
that the players can receive adequate treatment and management/treatment protocols
since most of the ringball players reported that they received no treatment or applied
self-treatment. This study also highlights the fact that coaches and players should pay
special attention to warming up before any competitive match and training session
since not doing so before training and competitive matches was a significant finding
that was associated with injury. Conclusion: Over the last decade, ringball has emerged as a popular sport played
across South Africa as well as internationally. The combination of the sport’s
uniqueness and similarities to other sport provides an interest platform for new
research, particularly in terms of injuires, as highlighted in this study.
Description
Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic at the Durban University of Technology, 2020.
Keywords
Ringball, Risk factors, Period prevalence, Mechanism of injury
Citation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3842