Repository logo
 

The comparative effectiveness of adjustments versus mobilisation in treating mechanical neck conditions

dc.contributor.advisorPenter, C. S.
dc.contributor.authorScott-Dawkins, Craig Anthonyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-15T08:16:12Z
dc.date.available2017-11-15T08:16:12Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.descriptionA dissertation presented to in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, Durban, South Africa, 1996.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of adjustments versus mobilisation in the treatment of mechanical neck pain. It was hypothesized that treatment with adjustments over a three week period, with a further three week follow-up period, would be more effective than mobilisation in terms of improving the patients' cervical ranges of motion and their perceptions of pain and disability.en_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.format.extent154 pen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2768
dc.identifier.otherDIT22198
dc.identifier.other62981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2768
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshChiropracticen_US
dc.subject.lcshNeck pain--Chiropractic treatmenten_US
dc.titleThe comparative effectiveness of adjustments versus mobilisation in treating mechanical neck conditionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SCOTT-DAWKINS_1996.pdf
Size:
9.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: