A case study : evaluation of adjudication as a dispute resolution method : NEC and FIDIC contracts
Date
2022-09-29
Authors
Mkhize, Zizodwa Zizo
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Construction development plays an important role in the development of South Africa,
not only in respect of its built infrastructure, but also in its broader economic and social
development. It also creates employment prospects on a broader scale. Construction
contract adjudication has been introduced in South Africa by means of four forms of
contracts endorsed by the Construction Industry Development Board. Amusan and
Owolabi (2014) mention that the unfavourable outcomes of project objectives in terms
of time, cost and quality are as a result of delays in construction projects. Although
disputes may be unwanted, having suitable knowledge to manage disputes when they
happen often provides better results for the disputants and the project. The study was
conducted in an electricity generation organisation, which has various divisions and
departments that develop and execute projects. Complex projects that require multiple
interdivisional or external stakeholder interfaces are planned, developed and
implemented in the Group Capital Division (GCD). The purpose of this research study
was to evaluate whether the causes, practices and outcomes of the construction
contract adjudication method for the Fédération Internationale des IngénieursConseils (FIDIC) were similar to those of New Engineering Contract (NEC) used for
infrastructure construction projects. A mixed method by means of a case study was
adopted to answer the research questions. Data were collected from an analysis of 33
study documents related to FIDIC and NEC contract case studies. The results of the
study showed the following: 1) There are comparable causes of disputes among the
two contracts, even though they vary in terms of ranking on each contract; 2) some of
the disputes referred to adjudication could have been avoided; and 3) FIDIC and NEC
complied with the adjudication practice, and the outcomes of the adjudications differed
based on the merits of each case.
Description
Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements of the degree of Master of Engineering: Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Durban University of Technology, 2021.
Keywords
Adjudication, Dispute resolution method, NEC, FIDIC
Citation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4324