Repository logo
 

Financial bootstrapping as a sustainable livelihood alternative for agricultural co-operatives in an emerging economy

Thumbnail Image

Date

2024

Authors

Zwane, Bonginkosi Keith
Nyide, Celani John
Sikwela, Misery
Mantzaris, Evangelos
Fuyane, Nkululeko

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Abstract

There is a scarcity of scholarly literature relating to financial bootstrapping in emerging economies, especially the use by co operatives in general and agricultural co-operatives in particular. As such, the financial bootstrapping methods used by agricultural co operatives in South Africa, an emerging economy, remain unknown (Rwekaza, 2021; Zantsi, 2021). The aim of this study is to determine the financial bootstrapping methods used by agricultural co-operatives. This study was undergirded by pragmatism, which allowed and guided the adoption of mixed-methods research. The qualitative aspect was given more priority or weight in answering the research questions, making it a quan → QUAL design. The study consisted of 52 agricultural co-operatives located in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. It was found that agricultural co-operatives practised some of the bootstrapping methods, especially those related to owner-related financing. However, there is little or no evidence of bootstrapping practices related to sharing resources and minimising capital invested in stock and accounts receivable. The co-operatives stifled their growth as they employed counter-bootstrapping activities caused mainly by their unsubstantiated beliefs. This research furnishes rural cooperatives with operational capital-enhancing guidelines that promote success

Description

Keywords

Agricultural Co-Operatives, Counter-bootstrapping activities, Developing economy, Financial bootstrapping, Growth, Sustainability

Citation

Zwane, B.K. et al. 2024. Financial bootstrapping as a sustainable livelihood alternative for agricultural co-operatives in an emerging economy. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review. 8(2): 37-47. doi:10.22495/cgsrv8i2p3

DOI

10.22495/cgsrv8i2p3

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By